Entries tagged with “children” from Trans-cendental
Thanks for the birth
And the feeding, and bathing, and changing
And the teaching, and loving
And the worry about my transition
And the eventual acceptance of who I am
And the worry about who I loved
And the acceptance of her into the family
And the worry about my future in the church
I know it is all because you love and care for me.
I love you, Mom.
And the feeding, and bathing, and changing
And the teaching, and loving
And the worry about my transition
And the eventual acceptance of who I am
And the worry about who I loved
And the acceptance of her into the family
And the worry about my future in the church
I know it is all because you love and care for me.
I love you, Mom.
There have been reports of child molestation by church leaders. Firearm discharge inside churches seems to be on the rise.
With these and other recent events, any organization would do well to examine their security policies. Yet for churches, we might well consider the theological basis of our choices.
For Christians, there is the example of the one who walked with lepers, the lame, adulterers, prostitutes, people with boils, the demon possessed, women with chronic bleeding, and tax collectors. Yet we also have a duty to protect those who are vulnerable.
How do we live grace and faith in God's protection, while caring for those around us?
With these and other recent events, any organization would do well to examine their security policies. Yet for churches, we might well consider the theological basis of our choices.
For Christians, there is the example of the one who walked with lepers, the lame, adulterers, prostitutes, people with boils, the demon possessed, women with chronic bleeding, and tax collectors. Yet we also have a duty to protect those who are vulnerable.
How do we live grace and faith in God's protection, while caring for those around us?
Continue reading What Would Jesus Do... ...about Church Safety?.
John said to him, âTeacher, we saw someone casting out demons in your name, and we tried to stop him, because he was not following us.â But Jesus said, âDo not stop him; for no one who does a deed of power in my name will be able soon afterward to speak evil of me. Whoever is not against us is for us. For truly I tell you, whoever gives you a cup of water to drink because you bear the name of Christ will by no means lose the reward."- Mark 9:38-41
Sometimes we forget to recognize that we're more alike than we are different. Sometimes we let differences in one area keep us from working together in another.
But not Friends Congregational UCC in College Station, Texas. Even though many of the churches that worked with Prison Fellowship were critical of gay and Lesbian persons, this Open and Affirming (OnA) congregation did not let this get in the way of participating in Prison Fellowship's Angel Tree program, which purchased gifts for children of inmates. Though they didn't agree on the sanctity of same-sex relationships, Friends Congregational realized that had nothing to do with helping children at Christmas. They believed in offering hope to kids whose only fault was having a parent who was convicted and imprisoned.
Unfortunately, after several years of participation, Prison Fellowship removed them from the program.
Prison Fellowship specifically refused to allow Friends Congregational UCC to continue to participate in a program to help imprisoned adults offer Christmas gifts to their children because Friends Congregational UCC is Open and Affirming of gay and Lesbian people.
The Rev. Dan De Leon, pastor of Friends Congregational, said the regional office of Prison Fellowship told him that, because the church belongs to the UCC's "Open and Affirming" program, it would not be allowed to participate in the Angel Tree program.
A Senior Vice President of Prison Fellowship said that, out of 12,000 participating churches, only a few congregations have been disqualified, usually due to doctrine on creation or homosexuality.
I doubt the kids - who would not have known which churches were involved, much less the churches' doctrine - would have cared.
"Whoever is not against us is for us. For truly I tell you, whoever gives you a cup of water to drink because you bear the name of Christ will by no means lose the reward."
References:
So the candidates were asked when children should be told about homosexuality. In programs like "It's Elementary", we're not talking about telling kids to be gay, or how to have gay sex. We're talking about different relationships. The fact is that there are kids who have same-sex parents - and it's good to teach kids to not beat up on the ones with same-sex parents, just as it's good to teach them to not beat up on children of divorced parents.
But the way some talk about tolerance, it would seem that it is the worst form of child abuse.
And isn't learning about other people a big part of elementary education? I remember learning about the people of Pompeii and about Umskikuk the Eskimo in Social Studies class. Learning about different people - and to not hate or be afraid of them - is an important part of growing up. After learning to respect people who are different, (we hope) adults will be less likely to attack people based on differences.
Of course, some people are afraid that such programs indoctrinate children into a lifestyle. Perhaps the Pompeii part of 6th grade social studies is what led to toga parties. I don't know - I've never been to a toga party. I have, however, been to Alaska and visited Inuit there. I didn't join them to live there the rest of my life, though.
Perhaps what people really fear is that a broad public school education will counteract the narrow training they give their children at home. It may really be about control - if we limit a child's knowledge, the child will only see limited options as an adult.
"Train children in the right way, and when old, they will not stray." - Proverbs 22:6
So what is the right way? Is it the way of judgment of others, or of love for others?
It saddens me that people who are followers of Jesus need the help of public schools to teach their children to love their neighbors. Parents, teach your children to do what you believe is right - but also teach them the love that Jesus had for others - even (perhaps especially) for those who were scorned.
References:
But the way some talk about tolerance, it would seem that it is the worst form of child abuse.
And isn't learning about other people a big part of elementary education? I remember learning about the people of Pompeii and about Umskikuk the Eskimo in Social Studies class. Learning about different people - and to not hate or be afraid of them - is an important part of growing up. After learning to respect people who are different, (we hope) adults will be less likely to attack people based on differences.
Of course, some people are afraid that such programs indoctrinate children into a lifestyle. Perhaps the Pompeii part of 6th grade social studies is what led to toga parties. I don't know - I've never been to a toga party. I have, however, been to Alaska and visited Inuit there. I didn't join them to live there the rest of my life, though.
Perhaps what people really fear is that a broad public school education will counteract the narrow training they give their children at home. It may really be about control - if we limit a child's knowledge, the child will only see limited options as an adult.
"Train children in the right way, and when old, they will not stray." - Proverbs 22:6
So what is the right way? Is it the way of judgment of others, or of love for others?
It saddens me that people who are followers of Jesus need the help of public schools to teach their children to love their neighbors. Parents, teach your children to do what you believe is right - but also teach them the love that Jesus had for others - even (perhaps especially) for those who were scorned.
References:
So the Arkansas Attorney General decided that a law that said gay people can't adopt was unconstitutional. No matter - the Arkansas legislature went back and said only married couples could adopt.
To put this another way, children may not be adopted by unmarried persons regardless of sexual orientation.
Throughout the Bible - in the Hebrew and Christian books - priests and prophets have spoken of the importance of caring for orphans. Yet Arkansas decided it would be better for these children to be housed in foster and group homes than to find a permanent home with one or more parents.
Children need a loving home. To deny children of the opportunity to be loved is to go against God's law and basic compassion.
Let us put the needs of children first.
References:
To put this another way, children may not be adopted by unmarried persons regardless of sexual orientation.
Throughout the Bible - in the Hebrew and Christian books - priests and prophets have spoken of the importance of caring for orphans. Yet Arkansas decided it would be better for these children to be housed in foster and group homes than to find a permanent home with one or more parents.
Children need a loving home. To deny children of the opportunity to be loved is to go against God's law and basic compassion.
Let us put the needs of children first.
References:
Another entry in health - a day late.
So children get the brush-off. I suppose that makes sense: State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) protects people who won't be able to vote for a few years anyway, so it's not much of a constituency yet. But, seeing as George W. Bush won't be running for re-election, why would he care? What's the point of the veto?
I understand the fear: middle-class parents might forgo buying their own insurance and enroll in SCHIP. But we're not talking about parents here, we're talking about children. Lower-middle-class parents often have to choose between rent, food, transportation, school books & supplies, and health care.
Let's not make choices that punish the innocent for the perceived sins of their parents. Let's not deny health care for children because of choices we fear their parents will make. Instead, let our grace extend to these little ones, ensuring that they can grow up healthy and have a chance at a better life than their parents may have had.
Who knows? Perhaps they will become healthy - and wealthy - enough to care for their then-aging parents, decreasing the burden on us all.
References:
So children get the brush-off. I suppose that makes sense: State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) protects people who won't be able to vote for a few years anyway, so it's not much of a constituency yet. But, seeing as George W. Bush won't be running for re-election, why would he care? What's the point of the veto?
I understand the fear: middle-class parents might forgo buying their own insurance and enroll in SCHIP. But we're not talking about parents here, we're talking about children. Lower-middle-class parents often have to choose between rent, food, transportation, school books & supplies, and health care.
Let's not make choices that punish the innocent for the perceived sins of their parents. Let's not deny health care for children because of choices we fear their parents will make. Instead, let our grace extend to these little ones, ensuring that they can grow up healthy and have a chance at a better life than their parents may have had.
Who knows? Perhaps they will become healthy - and wealthy - enough to care for their then-aging parents, decreasing the burden on us all.
References:
- http://www.pamshouseblend.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=3151
- http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=14947772&ft=1&f=3
Feed Subscription
If you use an RSS reader, you can subscribe to a feed of all future entries tagged “children”.
