Nativity: December 2010 Archives

The Massacre of the Innocents

|
December 28 is one of the liturgical dates for the feat day of the innocents (others are December 27 and 29). This marks the story of Herod killing infants in order to end the threat of "the newborn king" (Jesus) as told in the second chapter of the Gospel according to Matthew:

16 When Herod saw that he had been tricked by the wise men, he was infuriated, and he sent and killed all the children in and around Bethlehem who were two years old or under, according to the time that he had learned from the wise men. 17Then was fulfilled what had been spoken through the prophet Jeremiah:
18 'A voice was heard in Ramah,
   wailing and loud lamentation,
Rachel weeping for her children;
   she refused to be consoled, because they are no more.' (NRSV)
Jesus escapes this slaughter because his parents had been warned:

13
 Now after they had left, an angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream and said, 'Get up, take the child and his mother, and flee to Egypt, and remain there until I tell you; for Herod is about to search for the child, to destroy him.' 14Then Joseph got up, took the child and his mother by night, and went to Egypt, (NRSV)
But this makes me wonder: if the point of Jesus' birth is substitutionary atonement, that is:
  • God dies as an infinite payment for the sins of finite humans against an infinite God, or
  • A perfect human (Jesus) dies as payment for the sins of a perfect human (Adam), or
  • Jesus dies to trick Satan into taking a blameless person, who he can't keep, and thereby rescuing all who Satan has taken, or
  • any number of other schemes in which Jesus dies for our sins
then why would a perfect infant, or God in infant form, be an insufficient substitute for humanity?

Can it be only to fulfill the prophecy?

15
and remained there until the death of Herod. This was to fulfil what had been spoken by the Lord through the prophet, 'Out of Egypt I have called my son.'
Isn't prophecy merely to tell of the times (or sometimes the future), rather than for events to make prophecy true? Surely this could have been omitted from prophecy and Jesus killed with the rest of the children.

Don't get me wrong, I have no love for the idea of killing an infant Jesus nor any other infants who may end up as collateral damage in Herod's insecurity. But if the point of Jesus is the crucifixion, we have no need for the life of Jesus, and especially not the ministry of Jesus.

The story of the massacre of the innocents tells us that Jesus had something to do instead of, or in addition to, dying. When we focus merely on the death, or even the death and resurrection, of Jesus, we miss the point of Jesus' life.

And if there is a point to Jesus surviving to adulthood, and to His healing the sick, and his preaching justice for the poor and oppressed, then there is probably a point to our living to adulthood as well. We may not see it - sometimes we may despair that there is such a point - but I believe there is a reason why we're here.

On this day, I will mourn those who die as infants - in first century Palestine and in the entire world in the twenty first century - due to senseless violence, hunger, and neglect. I will be grateful that I have been spared, and seek out what my ministry - my reason for surviving to adulthood - may be. I will look at the example of Jesus, who was not merely faithful in dying, but was faithful in living as well. I will examine who I serve, and make corrections as best I can.

About this Archive

This page is a archive of entries in the Nativity category from December 2010.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Nativity: December 2010: Monthly Archives

Blogroll...

Churches
Clergy
Faith and Society
Improvisors
LGBT and allies
News
Seminarians
Seminaries
 

Books

Powered by Movable Type 4.35-en